Brian Flemming directed the controversial documentary film The God Who Wasn't There. Fresh written a rebuttal of Christian criticism belonging to the film for the film's official website. the film and points to somewhat of a critique by Earl Doherty associated with a Christian apologist's attack within the God Who Wasn't There.
Brian Flemming's The God Who Wasn't There Rebuttal
Brian Flemming: "Virtually many of the published criticism of one's God Who Wasn't There does exist from fundamentalist Christians. A handful of that criticism is determined by supernatural belief (i.e., we know that your Bible is true because God wouldn't normally allow errors), this FAQ is not going to bother addressing criticism of your variety. Rather, we'll address the key lines of attack critics are making relating to the film's claims and arguments with a non-supernatural angle."
Canadian scholar Earl Doherty is an author on the Jesus Puzzle and then an enlightening other writing on the internet for the Christ myth theory. He is considered the earth's foremost expert on the subject.
Earl Doherty's The God Who Wasn't There Rebuttal
Earl Doherty: "Brian Flemming's focus in The God Who Wasn't There seemed to be only partially sold on the subject of the non-existence of the historical Jesus, and my personal contribution to his DVD was no a couple of among several. But Licona has placed the Jesus Myth theory squarely with his sights, with myself inside the crosshairs, thus am taking it upon myself to answer the critique all together, including areas of it not related to the Jesus question."
Earl Doherty continues: "Licona starts by addressing the claim, previously by Flemming, that you've a gap having a minimum of Four decades, probably more, between Jesus' alleged life together with the recording of the particular life while in the Gospels, and the every one of the later Gospels essentially depend on Mark. He declares this 'far on the truth.' But the reason why in reality 'far' created by statement?"
Brian Flemming: "The review Earl is replying to, by an evangelical Christian and professional apologist, is a thing Appears made alert to but haven't invested the time to pore through. I confess not enough patience concerning critiques fueled by religious fanaticism, particularly when the pieces are tens of thousands of words long. A lot more too short and many types of that."
Richard Carrier's The God Who Wasn't There Rebuttal
Historian and philosopher Richard Carrier appears with the film and allows written extensively within the Christ myth theory. He defends the film against its critics within a The God Who Wasn't There rebuttal.
Richard Carrier: "In general, the film will be as much regarding the supernatural God the ones won't be there (the Jesus everyone believes could come home from space and kill us) given that the historical man who wasn't there, therefore it is achievement a documentary about historicity (that subject only occupies something yet another from the film and is covered entertainingly but briefly). I've found the film fun, funny, well-edited, and (by and large) well-produced. It's definitely an understanding good movie for atheists, plus it definitely pisses off Christians to no end. I enjoy it."
Richard Carrier furthermore published a white paper using his criticism on the God Who Wasn't There rebuttal.
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.ambravallo.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites